Sift
← Back

System

Architecture

A layered system. Ingestion at the base feeds the synthesis layers; the PM operates in the middle band; the audit log on top closes the loop — every override flows back down to recalibrate the priority engine.

System learnscloses the loop
6

Decision Audit Log

Every action logged against the recommendation. Each divergence is a labelled training signal; predicted-vs-actual surfaces at the 21-day mark.

Overrides + verdicts flow back to the Dynamic Priority Engine (L3) — the system recalibrates.
You operate herethe PM workspace · this build
5

Roadmap Drafting + Stakeholder Render

You

Pre-fills quarterly plans, drag-to-resequence with capacity awareness, generates audience-shaped artifacts (Sales / Exec / Customer / Eng).

4

Stakeholder Alignment Copilot

You

Surfaces conflicts, drafts alignment summaries, predicts escalation risk. Compresses the coordination loop.

System synthesizesthe substrate · assumed by the brief
3

Dynamic Priority Engine

Recalibrated by L6

Continuous synthesis, gated publication. Flags significant re-prioritization without auto-resequencing the public plan.

2

Opportunity Synthesis Engine

Semantic clustering of duplicate requests, summarization of customer pain, theme extraction. Replaces hours of manual tagging.

1

Context Graph

Continuous ingestion across Slack, Jira, CRM, support tickets, customer calls, analytics. Builds an organizational memory layer.

Slack · Jira · CRM · Calls · Analytics

Why this shape

Most prioritization tools live in layer 5 alone. They are systems of record — they store the prioritized list after the PM has already done the thinking. This system inverts that. Layers 1–3 do the synthesis. The PM operates in 4–5. Layer 6 makes the system learn.

The build in this case study covers layers 4–5 with realistic mocked data. Layers 1–3 (ingestion, synthesis, engine) are the architectural precondition; their existence is assumed in the brief.